![]() Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit will hear oral arguments on this appeal.Ī wide range of distinguished amici have argued to the court that it should uphold the Texas statute and thereby protect Americans from censorship. Unfortunately, Judge Robert Pitman, an Obama appointee, in early December enjoined the Texas non-discrimination social media law from going into effect.īut those who want a fair and democratic public discourse need not despair yet. That lower court decision was appealed, and soon the U.S. Texas’ law was cause for hope for many nationwide who want the giant social media platforms to be held accountable for their suppression of free speech. Along with explicitly prohibiting viewpoint discrimination by social-media companies, the law enables censored users to seek declaratory and injunctive relief in court. The law does so by prohibiting social media platforms with more than 50 million active monthly users in the United States from censoring users or their expressions based on the viewpoint expressed. It seeks to limit Big Tech companies’ power to silence viewpoints they don’t like. Taking a stand against Big Tech censorship, the state of Texas passed an anti-discrimination social media law (HB 20) last September. This is just the most recent example in a long train of Big Tech censorship actions. Babylon Bee Censorship Shows Why Fifth Circuit Should Uphold Texas’ Social Media LawĮarlier this week, Twitter locked the account of The Babylon Bee, a right-leaning parody site, after it awarded Rachel Levine, a transgender Biden administration official, the title of “man of the year” in reaction to USA Today naming Levine one of its “women of the year” last week.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |